Survey #1 bonus material
Thanks for helping me out by taking the survey. Here’s a piece that was left on the cutting room floor from “Seven Magic Moments.” Enjoy.
Reading from structure - Nassif versus Stark at Kobe 2004
It’s game five of the quarterfinal match between Gab Nassif and Ben Stark. In games one and three, Stark has overrun Nassif with typically explosive Affinity starts, whereas games two and four went to Nassif on the back of Oxidizes taking out key lands. The deciding game starts like this:
There are all sorts of meanings built into the idea of “reading” your opponent. Intuitively, we tend to take it to mean looking for tells, reading their body language, and other behavioral cues that don’t have anything to do with game mechanics. We might also take part in an active dialogue with the opponent, hoping that they’ll relax, start being conversational, and give up key information.
Another key form of “reading” comes from evaluating your opponent’s plays in terms of the ongoing structure of the match. When Ben’s play was an utterly atypical “land, go” Gab had to look back to the two losing games to identify an explanation. He decided Ben was probably sandbagging at least one zero-cost artifact to dodge Oxidize, and he was right – and that Chalice for zero caught two Welding Jars in Ben’s hand, crippling an otherwise explosive hand and taking game five, and the match.
If you find that your opponent’s play doesn’t make sense to you and they’re not being kind enough to give up information in words or body language, it may be time to cast your thoughts back across the whole of your match to find your explanation. It’s a solid rule of thumb that anytime you have one of those “That’s weird” moments about one of your opponent’s play, you should review the whole match in your head to see if something that happened earlier fills in the blanks about your current situation.


